Exploring Almost Forgotten Gravesites in the Great State of Ohio

Dedicated to cemetery preservation in the great state of Ohio


"A cemetery may be considered as abandoned when all or practically all of the bodies have been Removed therefrom and no bodies have been buried therein for a great many years, and the cemetery has been so long neglected as entirely to lose its identity as such, and is no longer known, recognized and respected by the public as a cemetery. 1953 OAG 2978."

Showing posts with label Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force. Show all posts

Sunday, June 12, 2016

The Wait Continues for Ohio's Lawmakers to Make Decisions Regarding the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force's Recommendations


From The "Chillicothe Gazette" - March 18, 2016:
*********************
From the Ohio Township Association:
And,

**************************
It will be two years this coming September since the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force concluded their year-long monthly meetings which included testimonies from several individuals and groups regarding various problematic issues plaguing Ohio's cemeteries and Native American burial grounds.  The task force then compiled all of the information from those meetings and presented their 260 page document of recommendations to Ohio's Governor, President of the Ohio Senate, and the Speaker of the Ohio House of Representatives.

Since September of 2014, Cliff Rosenberger has replaced William G. Batchelder as Speaker of the House.  

From all resources I have heard from to date regarding the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force's recommendations, there is no news to report about Ohio's lawmakers adopting any of those presented to them.

Friday, January 15, 2016

Ancient Ohio sites lack state protection from archaeology scavengers



Ohio's most vulnerable cemeteries, its inactive and abandoned ones, are unregistered by the fact that there have been no burials in them for the past 25 years. Thus, as unregistered cemeteries, unlike their registered counterparts, they are ineligible for someone to register a complaint against those responsible for them. 


Ohio has untold number of lost and forgotten cemeteries that have been neglected for decades; some in rural areas, and some in village and urban areas. It becomes a matter of community pride, available financial resources, along with the ravages of time, weather, and vandalism that can take a once presentable looking cemetery with rows of neatly standing gravestones into one that is barely recognizable as a cemetery.


Here is a link to the 260 page report of recommendations submitted by the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force which met monthly in 2014 that was submitted to the Governor of Ohio, The Ohio Speaker of the House, and the Ohio Senate President -- so we can see that there is so much more to this story that remains to be addressed and decided upon.



Friday, October 10, 2014

"Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force - Task Force Report & Recommendation - 29 September 2014" ~~ & Offering My Thoughts

The Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force committee has now concluded their year of monthly meetings reviewing the topic of the Ohio Revised Codes that pertain to Ohio's cemeteries.  

The task force's entire report is now posted on the Department of Real Estate's website

Click HERE to link directly to their report and recommendations.

The report includes a listing of the dates of the monthly meeting schedule,scanned in copies of the monthly meeting minutes (draft versions) and testimonies from those who attended meetings and presented them on behalf of organizations they represented, and the names of the task force members and the organizations they represented.


The Remaining Major Categories (from the "Executive Summary"):
Executive Summary
Task Force Mandate, Mission and Vision
Task Force Process Overview
Stakeholders Represented and Statements Given
Recommendations for Legislative Initiatives
Exhibits

 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
 The statement below is excerpted from the "Executive Summary":


"Task Force members were as diverse as the stakeholders that provided insightful information on the past, present, and future of cemeteries. During the many multifaceted discussions held by the Task Force one tenet became clear and was a driving force in the meetings: All burial sites and human remains, regardless of historic period or culture, deserve the same level of protection and respect. In following that tenet this report was crafted."

Below is a further break down from Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force's Report - Page 3:


"During discussions, central categories were identified and then used as a guide for deliberations":



1) Definitions

2) Preservation and Protection

3) Registration, Record Keeping and Technology

4) Maintenance

5) Enforcement

6) Funding

7) Statutory Alignment

8) Protected Groups


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 
 
 Excerpted from the Task Force Report - Page 15:

"4. The Task Force considered the feasibility of defining “inactive” cemeteries and requiring a registration process; however, it was determined that this could be problematic for lack of interested parties with sufficient interest to pay fees or be responsible for registration under existing  codes or rules."


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
My written testimony submitted February 2, 2014:

From: Linda Jean Limes Ellis



Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2014 4:52 PM

To: Petit, Anne; corynoonan12@gmail.com

Subject: RE: Exploring almost forgotten gravesites in Ohio



To Anne and Cory,




I am writing to you both, as co-chairs of the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force, on behalf of Ohio's inactive and abandoned cemeteries.



Ohio's earliest cemeteries have become the state's most endangered burial grounds due to their age.  So many have fallen victim to vandalism, and neglect of care to the point that they are hardly recognizable as cemeteries today.

Unfortunately,  inactive and abandoned cemeteries are not granted the same status as active cemeteries and are not registered in Ohio under the current laws.  As I am sure you both know, complaints can only be filed to the Ohio Cemetery Dispute Resolution Commission regarding registered cemeteries; which leaves the rest of Ohio's cemeteries out of the process. Surely, changes can be made to include them as well so all of Ohio's cemeteries are afforded the same protection.

Too much Ohio history has been lost and what is left needs to be preserved and saved.



Thank you for reading my message.  I appreciate your consideration of my appeal on behalf of Ohio's inactive and abandoned cemeteries for the reasons cited above.



I would be pleased to hear from you.  I wish you both and the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force great success with its work and ultimate recommendations.



Sincerely,


Linda Ellis
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


My Thoughts:

Thus, I am indeed saddened to know that, in the end, the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force members were not able to agree to conclude their work by adhering to their stated tenent that "All burial sites and human remains, regardless of historic period or culture, deserve the same level of protection and respect. "  

Their report did not include any recommendation to Ohio's Governor, Senate President, Speaker of the House, and the Ohio General Assembly, to recognize that inactive cemeteries need to be registered, just as active ones are registered, which would ensure that all of Ohio's cemeteries are at the same level of importance for such purposes as providing protection which includes the filing of official complaints against those who have neglected them, and restoring respect to the gravesites of the Buckeye state's earliest pioneers that have for too long been lost and forgotten.

Please, Keep Exploring Almost Forgotten Gravesites in Ohio, keep photographing gravestones, keep transcribing gravestone inscriptions and epitaphs, and keep documenting the historical facts about the lives of those who are buried at the cemeteries you visit.  Your efforts are appreciated, and your work will live on despite the defeat that inactive cemeteries have once again suffered to gain equal status with their active counterparts.  

Thank you.   

Tuesday, September 30, 2014

Meeting Minutes of the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force Committee - August 20 (Final), September 19 and September 24 (both draft) 2014

The Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force Committee has now concluded their monthly meetings.  All of their meeting minutes are posted online on the website of the Ohio Department of Commerce, Ohio Division of Real Estate and Professional Licensing - Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force Meetings and Testimony .

Hopefully, the cemetery law task force's final report will also be shared online after it is completed.  

The Ohio State legislators will be the ones to review the task force's report and act upon its recommendations one way or another.  

Thus, more news will follow on this subject once our state senators and representatives make their decisions based on the report.  


The members of the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force Committee are to be commended for their dedication to this vast and daunting subject pertaining to the various cemetery laws affecting the state's cemeteries as they do in several ways; many of which are difficult to interpret and fully understand. 

We hope that all of the work done by the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force Committee members during the meetings this year will translate into strengthening and improving the Ohio Revised Codes that impact Ohio's cemeteries; all of Ohio's cemeteries.    

*********************************

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE OHIO CEMETERY LAW TASK FORCE
77 S. High Street, 22nd Floor Hearing Room August 20, 2014
Columbus, OH 43215-6133 10:00 a.m.
_______________________________________________________________
I. Preliminary Matters

Co-chair Noonan called the meeting to order.
Roll Call: Laura Monick conducted roll call.

Present: Stephen George, Hon. Keith G. Houts, Hon. Cory Noonan, Anne M. Petit, Patrick Piccininni, Jay Russell, David Snyder, James Turner, James Wright.
Excused: Daniel Applegate, Dr. John N. Low

Review of Meeting Minutes: Co-chair Noonan opened the floor for discussion of the minutes of the July 25, 2014 meeting of the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force. There being no discussion Mr. Turner moved to approve the minutes of the July 25th meeting. Mr. Piccininni seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

II. Old Business

Co-chair Noonan opened the floor for discussion of old business.
Co-chair Petit introduced a letter from Bureau of Workers’ Compensation Administrator Steve Buehrer as addressed to Timothy C. Long, Ohio Cemetery Association Legislative Agent and Attorney, relating to the scope rating of cemetery salespeople. The task force discussed the complexity of the issue and that they were encouraged by the information that there is now an open dialogue concerning the issue. Mr. Russell then moved that the task force should note in the final report that this is an area of concern for cemeteries due to the impact of scope ratings on operating expenses. Mr. Turner seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

The discussion was then turned over to Mr. Turner to explain the process being followed by the sub-committee at their August 8th meeting. The sub-committee also met prior to this meeting to begin editing the initial draft as sent to the task force members. The task force then discussed the structural outline for the final report, the appropriate sections for topics that will be laid out in the final report and where more detail was needed.

The task force then moved on to the natural burial definition. The task force previously agreed to a definition and was left with discussing the proper location for the definition in the Revised Code. For consistency, the task force agreed that the definition should be placed in Ohio Revised Code section 1721.21 with the other cemetery definitions. This also requires a revision to Ohio Revised Code section 4767.01(A) to add the term “natural burial.”

Finally, the task force touched on the topic of tax advantaged easements and set aside programs. Research conducted by Mr. Russell found that Indiana has a process to lower the tax valuation for a cemetery on private property to $1/acre but that the process included the need for a professional survey and that this was often cost prohibitive to the landowner. Co-chair Petit found information that Michigan repealed their law but there was no documented reasoning behind the repeal. Finally, Co-chair Petit introduced information from Washington State concerning their law permitting non-profit preservation and maintenance corporations. The task force concluded that their recommendation should include information concerning the availability of numerous options that could help address the topic of historic cemeteries on private property.

III. New Business
Co-chair Noonan brought the task force into new business and discussion began on the limited time left for the task force to complete their final report. A final review was made of the report draft provided to the task force members; including whether there were any topics discussed by the task force but not included in the current draft.

The task force then deliberated on the distribution of the final report upon completion. Mr. George moved that a hard copy of the report be provided to the Governor, the Speaker of the House and the President of the Senate with an electronic version of the report being sent to the rest of the General Assembly. Mr. Turner seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

Upon discussion of the next meeting date the task force agreed to meet on September 19th at 10:00am. However, both co-chairs were unavailable on that day. Mr. Piccininni moved to designate a chair pro-tempore for the September 19th meeting. Mr. Turner seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

Mr. Turner nominated Mr. Piccininni as chair pro-tempore for the September 19th task force meeting. Co-chair Petit seconded the motion. Mr. Piccininni accepted the nomination. The motion passed unanimously.

The sub-committee asked that any ideas or corrections to the draft report be submitted by the task force members by September 1st and that anything submitted be related to discussions already held in order to help keep the drafting process moving in a timely manner. After those revisions, the target for a final draft being sent to the task force members is September 12th.

Next Meeting Dates:
September 19th at 10:00 am

IV. Adjournment
Mr. Turner moved to adjourn. Mr. Russell seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
As submitted by Laura A. Monick.
Final minutes not approved by the Task Force

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE OHIO CEMETERY LAW TASK FORCE
77 S. High Street, 22nd Floor Hearing Room September 19, 2014
Columbus, OH 43215-6133 10:00 a.m.
_______________________________
__________________________________________
I. Preliminary Matters

Pro-tempore Piccininni called the meeting to order.
Roll Call: Laura Monick conducted roll call.

Present: Daniel Applegate, Hon. Keith G. Houts, Patrick Piccininni, Jay Russell, David Snyder, James Turner, James Wright, Laura Monick on behalf of Anne M. Petit.
Excused: Stephen George, Dr. John N. Low, Hon. Cory Noonan, Anne M. Petit.

Review of Meeting Minutes: Pro-tempore Piccininni opened the floor for discussion of the minutes of the August 20, 2014 meeting of the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force. There being no discussion Mr. Turner moved to approve the minutes of the August 20th meeting. Mr. Russell seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

II. Old Business

Pro-tempore Piccininni opened the floor for discussion of old business and a page-by-page discussion began on the draft report completed by the writing sub-committee. Minor edits were made to pages 4, 5, 8, and 22 upon agreement of the members. An introductory sentence was also discussed for inclusion on page 14 to lead into the “Recommendation for Legislative Initiatives” section.

The task force then began discussions on the current edits made to the “Criminal Offenses and Penalties” and “Private Property Rights & Regulatory Taking Issues” sections of the report. Upon discussion, Mr. Turner moved that he would make edits to those sections using track changes and that the task force re-visits those two sections at the September 24th meeting. Mr. Russell seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

After completing a review of each page, Mr. Turner then moved to adopt the version of the report as amended during the meeting, including the introductory sentence on page 14, with the exception of pages 19, 20, 25 and 26. Mr. Wright seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Discussion then turned to the co-chairs and ensuring their opportunity to make edits. Mr. Turner moved to grant authority to Co-chairs Noonan and Petit to make editorial and grammatical changes without requiring approval of the full task force for their edits. Mr. Houts seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.
Next Meeting Dates:

September 24th at 9:30 am

III. Adjournment

Mr. Turner moved to adjourn. Mr. Houts seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously.

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
As submitted by Laura A. Monick.
Final minutes not approved by the Task Force

MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE OHIO CEMETERY LAW TASK FORCE
77 S. High Street, 22nd Floor Hearing Room September 24, 2014
Columbus, OH 43215-6133 9:30 a.m.

_____________________________________________________
I. Preliminary Matters

Co-chair Petit called the meeting to order.
Roll Call: Laura Monick conducted roll call.

Present: Daniel Applegate, Stephen George, Hon. Keith G. Houts, Dr. John N. Low, Anne M. Petit, Patrick Piccininni, Jay Russell, David Snyder, James Turner, James Wright.
Excused: Hon. Cory Noonan.

II. Old Business

Co-chair Petit brought the task force into old business and passed along regards from Co-chair Noonan and his appreciation for the task force members’ work.

The task force then began discussions on the current edits made to the “Criminal Offenses and Penalties” and “Private Property Rights & Regulatory Taking Issues” sections of the report. The members approved of the new edits and of how the sections captured the discussions of the task force. After discussion on wording, Mr. Piccininni moved to adopt the sections as drafted with the changes discussed during the meeting. Mr. Turner seconded the motion. Discussion then commenced on including a more specific reference to the transport and trafficking of funerary goods and human remains. After two additional edits, Mr. Piccininni moved to amend his motion to include the new edits. Mr. Turner amended his second. The amended motion passed unanimously.

The task force members then all expressed gratitude for each member coming into the meetings with open minds and expressing a willingness to engage in thoughtful discussions which resulted in a better understanding of all opinions presented to the task force.

III. Adjournment
The final meeting of the task force was then adjourned.

Thursday, September 18, 2014

Upcoming Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force Meetings - September 19 and September 24

REMINDER:
OHIO CEMETERY LAW TASK FORCE MEETINGS COMING UP. 

BOTH OF THESE MEETINGS ARE OPEN TO THE PUBLIC:

~*~*~*~*~*~*~

Friday, September 19, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.:
 

77 South High Street, 22nd
Floor Hearing Room
Columbus, Ohio 43215



Wednesday, September 24, 2014 at 9:30 a.m.:
 

77 South High Street, 22nd
Floor Hearing Room
Columbus, Ohio 43215

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can direct any questions about the meetings to:

Laura A. Monick
Registration and Resolution Section Chief
Ohio Department of Commerce
Ohio Division of Real Estate & Professional Licensing
77 South High Street, 20th Floor
Columbus, OH 43215
614-466-5384
www.com.ohio.gov

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Time is Running Out to Express Your Cemetery Concerns to the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force -- Next Meeting Open to the Public is Scheduled for Friday, September 19, 2014

The Ohio Cemetery Task Force has been meeting monthly in Columbus since January, 2014.   

Their report and recommendations are due to the Governor, Speaker of the House, and President of the Senate by September 29, 2014.

Speaking for myself, I am particularly troubled by one of the paragraphs that is in the July 25, 2014 meeting minutes that appears under Section III. "New Business" :

"Mr. Russell then expressed his belief that all cemeteries need to be protected including the tombstones that are artifacts about the people. Tombstones can be interpreted to show the economic status of the family by the type and size of stone used; if there was a stonecutter in the community; where the stone came from tells us about the trade between people; and decorations
and epitaphs which reveal to us much about the community itself. While these cemeteries do not
need to be maintained the same as registered cemeteries they do need some protection. The task
force members agreed with Mr. Russell’s statements and concluded that the statements should be
added as part of the justification under criminal sanctions."

***********
I agree that ALL cemeteries need to be protected, however, unfortunately in the State of Ohio the filing of a Cemetery Complaint to the Ohio Dispute Resolution Commission can only be made on behalf of registered cemeteries -- those with burials within the past 25 years and those that are not considered to be  'family cemeteries.' 

Cemeteries that do not meet the above-stated requirements are not eligible to be registered. Thus as non-registered cemeteries they are deemed to be ineligible to be included in the process of filing formal complaints against those who are responsible for them.  This includes for reasons such as lack of routine maintenance or any other issues negatively impacting them.  

This discrimination means relegating literally thousands of Ohio's oldest and most vulnerable cemeteries to be classified as inactive cemeteries and not eligible for the same protections as active cemeteries.     

 Active = Registered        Inactive = Non-Registered

"While these cemeteries do not need to be maintained the same as registered cemeteries they do need some protection." 

The one sentence directly above above fails to explain any reasons why the members of the Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force conclude "these cemeteries do not need to be maintained the same as registered cemeteries...." And "need some protection" -- why would they need any less protection than registered cemeteries??  Descendants and family researchers do visit inactive and abandoned cemeteries, and gravestone conservation workshops have been held in them to cite two reasons for maintaining  them.    

**********

 Ohio Revised Code - "Lawriter" & Registered Cemetery Information
 
Dennis Ginty; May 7, 2013: 

"The Division does not register cemeteries that are family cemeteries and it doesn’t register cemeteries that have not had an interments during that last 25 years.  A Family cemetery is defined as “a cemetery that contains the human remains of persons, at least three-fourths of whom have a common ancestor or who are the spouse or adopted child of that common ancestor.” 
 

"Yes, you are correct that the minimum maintenance guidelines apply to registered cemeteries (Ohio Revised Code Section 4767.06 (H)).  The Cemetery Dispute Resolution Commission does not have the authority to create minimum maintenance guidelines for non-registered cemeteries." 

"Ohio Revised Code Section 4767.07 states a person may file a complaint against any person operating or maintaining a cemetery registered pursuant to section 4767.03.  The Division does not have jurisdiction to take complaints against unregistered cemeteries.  We are not aware of any other complaint process." 

~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

The next Ohio Cemetery Law Task Force Meeting is open to the public and scheduled for:

Friday, September 19th at 10:00 a.m.
77 South High Street, 22nd Floor, Columbus, OH 43215

If you are not able to attend this meeting in person, please consider contacting:

Ohio Cemetery Task Force Co-Chairperson:

Anne.Petit@com.state.oh.us 

Anne M. Petit
Superintendent
Ohio Department of Commerce
Division of Real Estate & Professional Licensing
Direct dial: 614-466-3411
Fax number: 614-644-0584
Office number: 614-466-4100
 
Or

Per the August 20, 2014 meeting minutes, Mr. Patrick Paccininni, general counsel for ODOT, will be the designated chair person at the September 19, 2014 meeting.  

Patrick Paccininni
Phone #: 614-446-7200
patrick.paccininni@dot.state.oh.us